Candelaria v.
CB Richard Ellis, 2014 UT
App 1, No. 20120818-CA (Filed January 3, 2014)
ISSUES: Negligence,
Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress; Slip & Fall; Open & Obvious
Danger
Judge
Christiansen,
In this case, Plaintiff slipped on a
patch of ice that was allegedly covered by snow. The District Court granted the defendants’
motion for summary judgment, ruling that the danger was open & obvious. The Court of Appeals reverses, holding that
there was a material question of fact concerning whether the ice was open and
obvious.
The Court affirms dismissal of
Plaintiff’s claim of negligent infliction of emotional distress because there is
no evidence of emotional distress “that resulted in illness or bodily harm,” a
required element of the claim. “Candelaria’s
allegations would demonstrate that the defendants caused physical injury to her
that resulted in emotional distress, and not the other way around.” [A]ny emotional or psychological harm
suffered by Candelaria as a result of her physical injuries is properly the
subject of damages arising from her negligence claim, and not a separate claim
for negligent infliction of emotional distress.”
Keller v.
Martinez, 2014 UT App 2, No. 20121064-CA (Filed
January 3, 2014)
Issue: Duty to yield to right of way at traffic
intersections
Judge Roth,
This case
established that a party turning left through a green left turn arrow does not
owe a duty to yield to cars illegally entering the intersection, including cars
going straight. The case does leave open
the possibility of comparative negligence, if the party turning left does so
without caustion.
No comments:
Post a Comment